<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Searchpeers &#187; SEO News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchpeers.com/category/seo-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchpeers.com</link>
	<description>Boston-Based SEO and Internet Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:25:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Maps upgrade offers street views of businesses.</title>
		<link>http://www.searchpeers.com/google-maps-upgrade-offers-street-views-of-businesses/2010/04/27/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchpeers.com/google-maps-upgrade-offers-street-views-of-businesses/2010/04/27/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Church</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Marketing News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchpeers.com/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Better go make sure your retail operation&#8217;s information is up to date in Google, because Google Maps is now including local businesses in their maps&#8217; Street Views.  It looks to be a very dynamic system and I wouldn&#8217;t be at all surprised if we saw it integrating Yelp! and the ever-popular-on-Twitter Foursquare.  Check it out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://google-latlong.blogspot.com/2010/04/browse-local-businesses-in-street-view.html"><img class="size-full wp-image-68 aligncenter" src="http://www.searchpeers.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/ferry_blg_pois_cleanup-e1272394755990.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="351" /></a></p>
<p>Better go make sure your retail operation&#8217;s information is up to date in Google, because Google Maps is now including local businesses in their maps&#8217; Street Views.  It looks to be a very dynamic system and I wouldn&#8217;t be at all surprised if we saw it integrating Yelp! and the ever-popular-on-Twitter Foursquare.  Check it out on the <a href="http://google-latlong.blogspot.com/2010/04/browse-local-businesses-in-street-view.html">Google Maps blog</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchpeers.com/google-maps-upgrade-offers-street-views-of-businesses/2010/04/27/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google introduces &#8220;Like It?&#8221; to search results.</title>
		<link>http://www.searchpeers.com/google-introduces-like-it-to-search-results/2007/12/03/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchpeers.com/google-introduces-like-it-to-search-results/2007/12/03/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Church</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SERPs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchpeers.com/google-introduces-like-it-to-search-results/2007/12/03/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Google Blog: This experiment lets you influence your search experience by adding, moving, and removing search results. When you search for the same keywords again, you&#8217;ll continue to see those changes. If you later want to revert your changes, you can undo any modifications you&#8217;ve made. Note that this is an experimental feature [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.google.com/experimental/a840e102.html">From the Google Blog</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>This experiment lets you influence your search experience by adding, moving, and removing search results. When you search for the same keywords again, you&#8217;ll continue to see those changes. If you later want to revert your changes, you can undo any modifications you&#8217;ve made. Note that this is an experimental feature and may be available for only a few weeks.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is something that can bode for good or ill. I&#8217;d be surprised if this rolled out across the board without a serious review process related to its beta period.  The possibility for search engine results to be gamed seems too massive to ignore, like a sumo wrestler crammed into a phonebooth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchpeers.com/google-introduces-like-it-to-search-results/2007/12/03/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google De-ranks Pay-Per-Post Bloggers</title>
		<link>http://www.searchpeers.com/google-de-ranks-paid-per-post-bloggers/2007/11/20/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchpeers.com/google-de-ranks-paid-per-post-bloggers/2007/11/20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Church</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pagerank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay per post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchpeers.com/google-de-ranks-paid-per-post-bloggers/2007/11/20/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marketing Vox has the story, and I&#8217;d like to think this is a good thing. While inbound links are highly desirable and I can even quibble a bit over paid text links getting kicked to the curb so ruthlessly, the pure commercial ugliness of most Pay Per Post content immediately put me off any of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.marketingvox.com/archives/2007/11/19/payperposters-lose-pagerank-faster-than-you-can-say-google/?camp=newsletter&amp;src=mv&amp;type=textlink">Marketing Vox has the story,</a> and I&#8217;d like to think this is a good thing.  While inbound links are <strong>highly</strong> desirable and I can even quibble a bit over paid text links getting kicked to the curb so ruthlessly, the pure commercial ugliness of most Pay Per Post content immediately put me off any of the businesses involved in the scheme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchpeers.com/google-de-ranks-paid-per-post-bloggers/2007/11/20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

