<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Searchpeers &#187; pagerank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchpeers.com/tag/pagerank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchpeers.com</link>
	<description>Boston-Based SEO and Internet Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:25:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google De-ranks Pay-Per-Post Bloggers</title>
		<link>http://www.searchpeers.com/google-de-ranks-paid-per-post-bloggers/2007/11/20/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchpeers.com/google-de-ranks-paid-per-post-bloggers/2007/11/20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Church</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pagerank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay per post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchpeers.com/google-de-ranks-paid-per-post-bloggers/2007/11/20/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marketing Vox has the story, and I&#8217;d like to think this is a good thing. While inbound links are highly desirable and I can even quibble a bit over paid text links getting kicked to the curb so ruthlessly, the pure commercial ugliness of most Pay Per Post content immediately put me off any of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.marketingvox.com/archives/2007/11/19/payperposters-lose-pagerank-faster-than-you-can-say-google/?camp=newsletter&amp;src=mv&amp;type=textlink">Marketing Vox has the story,</a> and I&#8217;d like to think this is a good thing.  While inbound links are <strong>highly</strong> desirable and I can even quibble a bit over paid text links getting kicked to the curb so ruthlessly, the pure commercial ugliness of most Pay Per Post content immediately put me off any of the businesses involved in the scheme.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchpeers.com/google-de-ranks-paid-per-post-bloggers/2007/11/20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

